Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Womenstake, NWLC's Blog

Committee Hearing for Controversial Nominee

Posted by Rachel Rebouche, Fellow | Posted on: February 12, 2008 at 01:28 pm

by Rachel Rebouche, Fellow
National Women's Law Center

Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on the controversial nomination of Richard Honaker to the U.S. District Court for Wyoming. We told you about some of the problems with Honaker in a post last week.

Read more... Add new comment

Weekly Round-Up

Posted by Mary Robbins, Program Associate | Posted on: February 11, 2008 at 05:03 pm

by Mary Robbins, Program Assistant
National Women’s Law Center

The American Association of University Women has launched a blog addressing issues in the categories of education, social justice, Title IX, civil rights, economic security and employment.

Read more... Add new comment

7 Questions with NWLC's Fatima Goss Graves

Posted by NWLC, Intern | Posted on: February 08, 2008 at 07:45 pm

by Jessica Lauredan, Outreach Intern
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series profiling our blog authors.

Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Counsel at NWLC, works on ensuring gender equality in education through litigation, legislative policy, and public education.

Q: Your mother, Carol Goss, is President and CEO of the Skillman Foundation, a private organization working to improve schools and neighborhoods for children in southeast Michigan. How has her work influenced your career and goals?
Fatima:
Both of my parents emphasized a commitment to public service from a young age. I have two sisters, and they always instilled in all of us the importance of being involved in issues that we’re passionate about — and about giving both our time and talents to those issues. In addition to my work here at the Center, one sister directs philanthropic affairs and urban renewal for the City of Detroit, and, while still in school, my other sister has always been heavily involved in community activities.

Also, I come from a long legacy of civil rights activists. My father and aunt were the named plaintiffs in a significant post-Brown Supreme Court ruling that desegregated schools in Knoxville, Tennessee, during the height of the civil rights movement.

Q: Over the years, the civil rights movement and the women’s rights movement have coincided and sometimes clashed. As a woman of color, do you ever feel torn between your loyalties as an African-American and as a feminist?
Fatima:
I’m not sure I’d put it exactly that way — these are movements that have benefited from and fostered each other. And these movements continue to work in strong coalitions together; I work with many civil rights organizations on a regular basis and our work often overlaps.

That said, I strongly believe that feminists have a duty to be committed to racial and broader social justice, and there is a similar duty for civil rights activists to advocate on behalf of women and girls. And in so doing, feminists have to ensure that their advocacy takes the needs of all women into account, not just white women. Similarly, civil rights activists must ensure that their advocacy does not focus on progress for only men of color.

Read more... 2 comments

The President's Health Care Budget Proposal: Please Pass the Pepto Bismol

Posted by Lisa Codispoti, Senior Counsel | Posted on: February 07, 2008 at 09:17 pm

by Lisa Codispoti, Senior Advisor
and Brigette Courtot, Policy Analyst
National Women’s Law Center

This post is part of a weekly series on Women and Health Reform.

The stomach flu is making its way through the NWLC Health team — this could be why both of us spent the better part of Monday morning praying to the porcelain goddess. On the other hand, it might have just been a reaction to the President’s budget.

When President Bush released his final budget earlier this week, his proposal for health care funding was so ghastly that many on Capitol Hill pronounced it “dead on arrival”. Why get all worked up about a proposal that is already “dead”? Well, these proposals may be on the road to nowhere (and, frankly, he’s recycled more than a few of them from last year’s budget) but they are leaving a lot of exhaust in their wake. As disturbing as the budget itself is, it’s the ideology lurking behind the proposals that really has us worried — you know, the belief that the healthy and the wealthy should benefit at the expense of the elderly, the sick, and the poor.

The final Bush budget reflects several conservative views about how to address America’s health care crisis, and it demonstrates exactly what is at risk in the debate over how to fix our broken health care system. Let’s start with Medicare and Medicaid: these programs form a critical safety net for nearly 50 million elderly, low-income, and disabled women. Instead of providing funding to adequately support these programs, the President would instead cut a combined total of more than $200 billion from Medicare and Medicaid over the next five years.

Read more... Add new comment

Cutting Taxes for the Rich — While Women and Families Get Cut Out

Posted by | Posted on: February 07, 2008 at 08:20 pm

by National Women’s Law Center

People are losing their jobs, homes, and health care. So on Monday the Bush administration released a new budget that proposes to cut taxes for millionaires — and services for everyone else.

Many vital supports to vulnerable women and children were cut by the President’s budget, including:

Read more... 1 comment

Senate Shouldn't Bow to White House Pressure

Posted by Rachel Rebouche, Fellow | Posted on: February 07, 2008 at 05:32 pm

by Rachel Rebouche, Fellow
National Women’s Law Center

This morning, President Bush hosted an event at the White House with pending nominees, including judicial nominees. His message was that the Senate has failed in its job to confirm these nominees.

Read more... Add new comment