Skip to contentNational Women's Law Center

Womenstake, NWLC's Blog

Weekly Round-Up

Posted by Mary Robbins, Program Associate | Posted on: January 28, 2008 at 03:34 pm

by Mary Robbins, Program Assistant
National Women’s Law Center

Joan Entmacher, vice president for Family Economic Security at NWLC, talks to Politico about the need for fair taxes that meet the nation’s needs.

Read more... Add new comment

7 Questions with NWLC’s Jill Morrison

Posted by NWLC, Intern | Posted on: January 25, 2008 at 04:29 pm

by Jessica Lauredan, Outreach Intern
National Women’s Law Center

This post is the first in a weekly series profiling our blog authors.

Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel at NWLC, works with the Health and Reproductive Rights team to secure full access to adequate health care for women and girls. 

Q: What’s the most rewarding part of your work?
Jill: I would say working with a community of people who ultimately all want to see a better world for women. It never fails to astound me that I have the privilege to contribute in some small way and to work with such bright, smart, talented women. I thrive on this environment of social justice for women. This is my dream job. 

Q: What do you hope to accomplish?
Jill:
Making this world a place where women can go as far as their talents and desires will take them. Giving women equal opportunities. But this can’t happen without a just society that promotes women to do so.

Q: What are the most common misconceptions about feminism you encounter?
Jill:
That feminists are all man-hating, angry, reactionary, bitter women. That’s not true — only some of us are.

No, I would have to say the most common misconception is that feminism is dead.  So many women advance feminist ideals but don’t necessarily describe them that way. Feminism is alive and well.

Q: Much of your work focuses is on the impact of religious restrictions on health care. What would be the ideal balance between an individual’s religious beliefs and adequate, fair health care?
Jill:
Well, I could write a book on that! I think Title VII strikes a pretty fair balance between religion and health care. It basically states that you can observe your religion and its practices so long as they do not interfere with your work. So if your religion prohibits you from dispensing birth control, you should not be the only pharmacist on hand at any given pharmacy. It’s a patient’s right to receive that medication. On the other hand, if you wear a long, draping head covering which would make it dangerous to operate heavy machinery, it should be your employer’s right to ask you to remove it. Title VII is reasonable medium for both parties.

Read more... 2 comments

Restoring Order and Fairness to the Workplace

Posted by | Posted on: January 24, 2008 at 07:04 pm

by Fatima Gross Graves, Senior Counsel
National Women’s Law Center

Today I attended the Senate HELP Committee hearing on the Fair Pay Restoration Act where Lilly Ledbetter and two other witnesses testified in support of the bill. The room was packed and silent as everyone listened to Ms. Ledbetter tell her story of nearly 20 years of harassment and pay discrimination.

Read more... Add new comment

Okay Lady, Back Away From the Grande Mocha Frappe-Whatever!!

Posted by Jill C. Morrison, Senior Counsel | Posted on: January 23, 2008 at 03:34 pm

by Jill Morrison, Senior Counsel
National Women’s Law Center

Unless you’ve been under a rock, you’ve seen the latest alarming study about pregnancy: “coffee causes miscarriages!” Well, that is not exactly what the study said, but that certainly is the message you would get if you only saw the popular media coverage. 

Read more... Add new comment

Weekly Round-Up

Posted by Mary Robbins, Program Associate | Posted on: January 23, 2008 at 02:12 pm

by Mary Robbins, Program Assistant
National Women’s Law Center

Amanda at Pandagon wonders whether reduced access to abortion for low-income women leads to higher rates of forced childbirth than if abortion was illegal.

Read more... Add new comment

35 Years After Roe: What Choice Means to Us

Posted by | Posted on: January 22, 2008 at 12:01 pm

by the Health and Reproductive Rights Team
National Women’s Law Center

Today is the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that secured abortion rights for women in the United States. Here at the National Women’s Law Center, we’ve been reflecting on what choice means to each of us.

When I was only 10 years old, my mother took me and my two sisters to a pro-choice march on the National Mall. As my mother bravely answered my question about the meaning of a coat hanger with a line through it, an image on many of the marchers’ signs, I learned the lengths to which women will go to end their pregnancies when abortion is not legal. Today, I support choice because I never want to return to the desperation that results when women lack control over their own bodies. — Jen

As an African-American woman, I take extreme offense at efforts to mobilize the black community to oppose abortion rights by invoking slavery. The essence of slavery is taking away someone’s power to make decisions about their own bodies, labor and lives. Sounds more like anti-choice thinking to me. Choice is freedom. — Jill

My commitment to the principle that women should make their own decisions about their bodies is longstanding and deep. So I was surprised when, after I adopted a child, some people questioned my commitment. How can you, an adoptive mother, who benefited because a woman chose not to have an abortion, support abortion? they said. My commitment is to the principle that the woman decides. I am so grateful for this birth mother's decision, but it is not for me or anyone else to make that decision for her. — Judy

Though a long-time supporter of the right to safe and legal abortion, I began to define “pro-choice” differently in those terrifying-yet-liberating days when I was coming out to my friends and family. Supporting choice is more than securing reproductive freedom; it is support for the right to determine our own life course, and to make major life decisions about marriage, sex, children, and family without interference and with the respect of others. — Brigette

What if everyone knew their rights and took precautions to improve their health? I grew up bouncing between the Middle East and South Asia where I witnessed innumerable communities unwilling to embrace reproductive and sexual health issues. Cultural taboo silenced topics such as pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and contraception. My upbringing in these environments fueled my passion for and belief of reproductive choice. — Dina

Read more... 6 comments

Looking for a Way to Honor Dr. King? Support Civil Rights Legislation

Posted by Fatima Goss Graves, Vice President for Education and Employment | Posted on: January 21, 2008 at 12:11 pm

by Fatima Goss Graves, Senior Counsel
National Women’s Law Center

Every January our nation pauses to remember and celebrate the life of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Some communities hold marches, rallies or vigils. Here in D.C. there are countless concerts and one theater is even showing a film to commemorate Dr. King’s legacy. 

Another important way to honor Dr. King’s legacy is by further promoting civil rights. You may know that Congress has long outlawed discrimination based on sex, race, national origin, disability, and age in employment and by recipients of federal funds. These statutes have opened opportunities in every facet of our lives and have ensured that federal funds do not subsidize discrimination. But a series of Supreme Court decisions has steadily weakened these basic civil rights protections. For example, Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination, including sexual harassment, in education, may be enforced by individuals, including in law suits for damages. But the Supreme Court held in the late 90s that individuals cannot fully hold schools accountable if a teacher or classmate harasses a child unless the school had actual notice of the abuse and did virtually nothing to correct the problem. What does that mean in practical terms? In the Court’s upside-down decision, students have fewer legal protections from harassments than adults. It also means that schools have incentives to turn a blind eye to clear signs of harassment. Bad news for civil rights plaintiffs.

Read more... Add new comment

Sex and the Subprime

Posted by Kristina Gupta, Policy Fellow | Posted on: January 18, 2008 at 07:40 pm

by Kristina Gupta, Policy Fellow
National Women’s Law Center

Yes, it’s true – sex matters in the housing market. Research shows that women are more likely to receive subprime mortgages than men. And because subprime mortgages are a driving force behind foreclosures, as the housing market continues to struggle, more and more women may lose their homes.

Read more... Add new comment